Feedback from presenting my animation;

From presenting my animation, I received feedback, which would allow me to progressed in the future making amendments to the less successful parts in the project and highlighting the successful parts. It was quite constructive feedback.

Overall from the feedback the parts that everyone thought worked really well were the locations, the scene, links between the visuals, and the organic nature from the outdoors. They also liked the flow and transition from one scene to the next as well as the less rehearsed nature of the video to make it fit the genre.

Unfortunately though, there were picky critics that thought that one more location added to the music video would have made it more successful. They also picked up that there was no notion of looking, but when they deliberated over this it was clear, they were in fact wrong, as there was a mirror scene that adopted this.

The critical people also thought that one more location was needed so that I ensured that the music video was not too repetitive, as you have to try and make the video have multiple views. I’m not sure if this though works on my music video, as I want it to revolve around the singing more then what is actually happening in the video.

The other comment they made was that from the last ten frames of the storyboard it was unclear as to what was actually happening, once I explained the idea; that it was almost Ruby Collins running to show she was free and having a good time, they understood the action. I did though apologize for the last few drawings, as 100 drawings on my own in five days is harder then split by three people.

In terms of following the Goodwin principles set, I did to an extent. I just chose to avoid the intertextual referencing. From this feedback I will make the changes and the corrections to make the audience happier.